AMPUTATION REVISION IN AN ASIAN REHABILITATION CENTRE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.428Abstract
A retrospective study was carried out of amputation revisions performed at Green Pastures Hospital and
Rehabilitation Centre between Jan 1990 and April 2004. The purpose was to determine the reasons for
revision and whether these were preventable, and as well assess the outcome of the revision itself. A total
of 26 revisions were performed; in 18 cases the primary amputation had been performed at another
centre. The primary amputations were due principally to trauma, vascular disease and complications of
leprosy. A poorly formed stump was the most common indication for revision (9), followed by recurrent
ulceration (5) and infection (3). In 16 cases the need for revision was probably preventable. Only one
patient required an amputation at a higher level. Prior to revision only one patient was able to wear a
prosthesis; all but one patient were able to ambulate with their prosthesis following revision in a median
time of eight weeks. Amputation revision in a rehabilitation centre has a high success rate in ambulation
with a low complication rate. Greater attention to detail during the primary amputation will prevent the
need for revision in many cases.
Key Words: Amputation, Revision, Rehabilitation, Complications.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
JNMA allow to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The author(s) are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions. The JNMA work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. More about Copyright Policy.